« Signing certificate hack brings vulnerability to light | Main | Louisville TV market ratings of regional basketball final surpass Super Bowl »

Monday, March 28, 2011

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Nate Hiatt

Mark my words, it's coming... TWC rolls out ESPNNetworks.com, HBOGO.com and now this... soon to come, Data Caps with overage fees!

Mark

I don't see what the fuss is about. The subscribers to TimeWarner Cable have already paid for the privilege of watching these channels, and the content on those channels. Just because they ware watching it on an iPad while lounging by the pool vs. stuck inside the house watching it on a TV should not make a difference to them. They got their money via the subscription that these customers paid to TimeWarner.

Whether or not these programmers and content providers like it, and while we are not quite there yet, there will come a time when watching TV content and channels on your tablet, phone, or other wireless mobile device will be as commonplace as TVs are today.

Thanks to technology like Slingbox, Orb, and many other software and hardware solutions, people have been place-shifting (and time-shifting) their cable TV subscriptions for years. These programmers and content providers need to catch up with modern times. Watching their content on an iPad vs. a 2nd or 3rd TV in the house should not make a difference to them.

Bryon

That’s nice they got all 32 channels up and running for their customers. I’m sure they appreciate it. The selection is like a basic cable package was in the 80’s. I like watching TV on my iPhone and I plan to get an iPad soon. I can watch ALL of the channels I subscribe to because I have a DISH Network employee account with a Slinbox. I get 200 HD channels to watch and all work on my iPhone. TWC was nice to get that iPad app going but I bet their customers would like to watch outside of their homes too.

The comments to this entry are closed.