« Insight offering a free preview of CBS College Sports | Main | Cyber Monday is today »

Monday, November 23, 2009

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

sineswiper

But, Hulu is gearing towards a pay service. Guess Hulu can't pay the bills right now, huh?

Lenley

I think people often give Google too much credit (in many ways like Apple) for some of the great positions it takes on various issues --as though the positions are solely the result of some inner moral compass as opposed to directly correlated to business strategy.

Google is many interested in disrupting content providers, (orphan book search is a perfect example) as Goog insures that it does not actually produce exclusive content.

Yet, Youtube's problem is keeping corporate content providers locked in to knowingly or unknowingly providing exclusive content.

Youtube is unlike search, Hulu (remember Google's hubris? going so far as to call hulu clownco?) has shown content providers can easily draw the attention of both consumers and premium advertisers. Once vevo gains steam, youtube will lose substantial music traffic.

That's a huge problem in the long-term for Google.

Ian L

`YouTube makes money on advertising. If you can't do advertising on an STB, you can't really pay the bills. Google doesn't have to give their stuff out for fre everywhere, and the STB manufacturers can make an agreement with another video provider if they'd like.

The comments to this entry are closed.