Blogs I read

Broadband Reports
IP Democracy
The Bauminator
Blog Maverick
Multichannel News
Cable 360.net
CableTechTalk
BC Beat
Engadget HD

My pages

Visit my Facebook profile
Visit my YouTube channel

Why I'm doing this

It's conventional wisdom. When it comes to communicating with the public, most companies take the safest path. They usually play their cards pretty close to their chest. I'm joining the blogsosphere to challenge that "wisdom."

Read more

Comments policy

Comments are posted immediately. I review the comments and will remove those that are not germane to the topics being discussed on the blog. Individual customer issues will be removed if posted. If you have a specific issue with your Insight service that you have been unable to resolve, feel free to contact me at michaelwillner@insightbb.com.

« Here we go again -- more advocates for government regulation of the Internet | Main | Tuesday article links: a new feature unveiled »

Bad news for consumers as a-la-carte lawsuit proceeds

A federal lawsuit challenging cable operators and programmers on the issue of a-la-carte programming has managed to rise from the dead, as a Los Angeles-based federal judge has is allowing the case to proceed after originally dismissing it. Multichannel News recently reported that District Judge Christina Snyder ruled late last month that the case would move forward.

Snyder had originally dismissed the plaintiffs case against several cable operators and programmers in March, but later reinstated it after they amended their claims.

Quote Judge Christina Snyder, in a June 25 ruling, decided that the cable operators, direct-broadcast satellite companies and studios that were sued had not proved their arguments. Those companies alleged that the lawsuit, filed on antitrust grounds, did not adequately demonstrate that consumers were injured by the business practices of the defendants. In written and oral arguments on June 16, they also questioned the standing of the consumers to sue.

In one of my early posts here, I explained why I believe that a-la-carte is a bad deal for consumers. The current programming lineup model provides for a tremendous programming diversity. An a-la-carte programming model would lead to the extinction of many existing networks and many new niche networks would never get the funding to launch.

Misguided consumer advocates have tried to advance government mandated a-la-carte through the usual policy-making routes like Congress and the FCC. Thus far, they have been unsuccessful in these attempts because members of Congress who focus on telecommunications issues and a majority of the FCC commissioners understand the consequences of government mandated a-la-carte.  Now they're angling for government mandated a-la-carte by judicial fiat.

It's an unfortunate development potentially advancing a flawed policy that doesn't benefit consumers. If successful, this lawsuit opens the door for a drastically dumbed-down television landscape, not to mention higher bills and less service for customers.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/2975620/30798748

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Bad news for consumers as a-la-carte lawsuit proceeds:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

I have gone back and forth with this topic at the Cable Tech Talk blog.

How do you see a-la-carte being a poor choice for consumers? Specifics would be nice to see other than the vague, It would be bad doom and gloom.

I posted this a couple of months ago. I think it answers the specific reasons why I oppose a-la-carte.

http://www.michaelsinsight.com/2008/05/cable-a-la-cart.html

The comments to this entry are closed.

 Subscribe | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2008 Michael Willner. All Rights Reserved.